THE CHALLENGES OF THE R-20 FORUM IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY

  • Eikel Ginting Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
Keywords: R-20, Ambivalence of Religion, Reconstruction of Religious Identity, new face of religion

Abstract

The G20 forum, which Indonesia is hosting in 2022, was accompanied by the implementation of the R20 forum initiated by PBNU. The forum is a meeting of interfaith leaders from various parts of the world. This meeting between religious leaders is an encouragement for religions to carry out peace and humanitarian actions. As a forum that becomes a bridge between religious leaders, there are challenges and also differences in goals that become bridges. Not to mention the narrative of wounds and the history of violence that occurred between religions, making obstacles in interfaith encounters rigid and mere formality. So this paper wants to examine the role and meaning of the R20 forum, in reconstructing religious identity. The dualistic meaning of religious identity, which can be interpreted as the root of violence, can also be interpreted as the root of peace. This research uses a literature review, using sources that review the results and direction of the R-20 Forum. Equipped with literature analysis related to the meaning of religion, and dualistic religious identity. Through this paper, it is found that the R-20 forum is a new hope for religion to focus on humanitarian, ecological and socio-economic issues. By prioritizing these values, the construction of the ambivalent face of religion will lead every religious community to prioritize the value of peace and humanitarian development.

 

References

Alwi Shihab. (2014). Building Bridgers Through Inter-Religious Dialogue. In B. Adeney-Risakotta (Ed.), Dealing With Diversity: Religion, Globalization, Violance, Gender and Disaster in Indonesia. Globalethics.net.

Emile Durkheim. (1995). The Elementary Forms Of Religious Life (Karen E. Fields (ed.)). The Free Press. https://monoskop.org/images/a/a2/Durkheim_Emile_The_Elementary_Forms_of_Religious_life_1995.pdf

Gora, R. B. (2019). Melacak Peran Agama Dalam Ruang Publik. Logos , Jurnal Filsafat-Teologi, 165.

Hasenclever, A., & Rittberger, V. (2000). Does religion make a difference? Theoretical approaches to the impact of faith on political conflict. Millenium, 29(3), 641–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290031401

Hertog, K. (2010). The Complex Reality of Religious Peace Building : Conceptual Contributions and Critical Analysis. Lexington Books.

John A. Titaley. (2010). Kitab Suci Sebagai Akar Kekerasan Dalam Agama. In Memahami Kebenaran Yang Lain Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hidup Bersama. Taman Pustaka Kristen Indonesia dan Fakultas Teologi UKDW.

Kay, A. (2018). Erikson Online: Identity and Pseudospeciation in the Internet Age. Identity, 18(4), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2018.1523732

Kemenag. (2022). Indeks Kerukunan Umat Beragama Tahun 2021 Masuk Kategori Baik. https://www.kemenag.go.id/read/indeks-kerukunan-umat-beragama-tahun-2021-masuk-kategori-baik

Kholiludin, T. (2018). Wajah Ganda Agama: Integrasi, Konflik Dan Rekonsiliasi. Iqtisad, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v4i1.1999

Kusumaningrum, D., Ali-Fauzi, I., Rafsadi, I., Manuputty, J., Wuye, J., Muhammad, A., Nurul, A., Panggabean, S. R., Hutagalung, S., & Al Qurtuby, S. (2017). Ketika Agama Bawa Damai, Bukan Perang: Belajar dari “Imam dan Pastor.” In Ketika agama Bawa Damai, BuKan Perang. PUSAD Paramadina. https://www.suaraislam.co/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/KetikaAgamaBawaDamai-Web-1.pdf#page=15

M. Iqbal. (2022). Kemenag Cilegon Sebut Izin Pembangunan Gereja yang Ditolak Belum Penuhi Syarat. DetikNews.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6283960/kemenag-cilegon-sebut-izin-pembangunan-gereja-yang-ditolak-belum-penuhi-syarat

Malory Nye. (2008). Religion: The Basics (Vol. 2). Routledge.

Manuel Castell. (2020). The Power of Identity, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. In The Power of Identity Claims (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003011590-1

Mohamad Zaki Husein. (n.d.). Sosiologi Agama Durkheim. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/kmi/islam/gapai/Durkheim.html

Muzaqqi, F. (2019). Diskursus Demokrasi Deliberatif di Indonesia. Pusat Penerbitan dan Percetakan Airlangga Press.

Oppong, S. H. (2013). Religion and Identity. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(6). www.aijcrnet.com

Paulus S. Widjaja, Djoko Prasetyo Adi Wibowo, I. G. (2021). Politik Identitas dan Religiusitas Perdamaian Berbasis Pancasila di Ruang Publika. Gema Teologika: Jurnal Fakultas Theologia UKDW, 6 No. 1.

Renard, J. (2012). Fighting Words: Religion, Violence, and the Interpretation of Sacred Texts. In Fighting Words: Religion, Violence, and the Interpretation of Sacred Texts. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2014.1002181

Rochmanudin. (2022). Ini 7 Poin Hasil Forum Agama R20 Bali. IDN Times Times. https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/rochmanudin-wijaya/7-poin-hasil-r20-bali-tokoh-agama-dorong-budaya-damai-solusi-global

Samuel, & Tumonglo, E. E. (2023). Toleransi: Peran Tokoh Agama sebagai Perekat Kerukunan Umat Beragama. Abrahamic Religions: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 3(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.22373/arj.v3i1.14734

Scott Appleby. (2000). The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. In Rowman & Littlefield (Vol. 13, Issue 1). Rowman & Littlefield.

Steph Lawler. (2014). Identity: Sociological Perspective (2nd ed., Vol. 21, Issue 1). Polity Press. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Suara Lampung. (2023). Aksinya Bubarkan Ibadah di GKKD Bandar Lampung Dikecam, Ketua RT Buka Suara - Suaralampung.id. https://lampung.suara.com/read/2023/02/21/111140/aksinya-bubarkan-ibadah-di-gkkd-bandar-lampung-dikecam-ketua-rt-buka-suara

Taylor, S. (2015). Identity Construction Book Section. Open Research Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi099

Wahju S. Wibowo. (2016). Iman dan Agama Yang Membebaskan. In Teologi Yang Membebaskan dan Membebaskan Teologi. Yayasan TPK Indonesia & Fakultas Teologi UKDW. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert-Setio/publication/334041805_Book_Teologi_yang_Membebaskan_dan_Membebaskan_Teologi_final/links/5d138915458515c11cfb46bd/Book-Teologi-yang-Membebaskan-dan-Membebaskan-Teologi-final.pdf

Yamin, S. (2008). Understanding religious identity and the causes of religious violence. Peace Prints: South Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 1(1), 1–21.

Zahareas, A. N. (1984). Unamuno’s Marxian Slip: Religion as Opium of the People. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.2307/1315458

Published
2023-06-29
How to Cite
Ginting, E. (2023). THE CHALLENGES OF THE R-20 FORUM IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF RELIGIOUS IDENTITY. BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen, 4(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v4i1.162
Section
Articles